The engine as a product
Root-cause analysis your organisation can click through
Fishbone diagrams end as a slide. causa keeps the same structure, problem domains branching into causes and effects, but makes every node interactive, every claim evidence-linked, and every verdict about actionability explicit. The graph you can open on this site is the flagship reference implementation; the engine behind it is topic-agnostic.
What changes when a diagram becomes a graph
A static diagram asks the reader to trust the author. A causal graph asks the author to show the evidence: which analysis supports this mechanism, which number quantifies it, and whether anyone has yet checked. Findings your organisation has validated look different from hypotheses still under investigation, and a reviewer can tell the two apart at a glance. That audit-grade distinction is the point.
The same model, your vocabulary
| In the reference graph | In your organisation |
|---|---|
| Policy field | Problem domain |
| Claim | Causal mechanism |
| Aligned voice | The experts and analyses you trust |
| Source blacklist | Your data governance |
| Fixability | Actionability, the thing you pay to see |
| Support state | Validated finding versus hypothesis under investigation |
Whitelabel by design
No topic content lives in the code. Fields, claims, the roster and the blacklist are data; colours, type and spacing are one token file. A client deployment is a data import and a token swap, not a fork. One graph instance maps one topic, so each engagement gets its own graph with its own trusted voices.
What it is not, yet
There is no multi-tenancy, no user management and no hosted offering. The engine runs locally against one database and syncs its curated data to a repository. Those are known destinations, not current features, and they are listed here so the demo is not mistaken for a service.
The reference graph is the live demo: drill from a field to a cause to its effects and open the citations behind any claim.
Open the demo