The roster
Voices
The graph curates one school of thought. These are the experts and institutions whose texts can move a claim from hypothesis to supported. Everyone else is a lead: mined for candidate causes, never cited as support.
| Voice | Affiliation | School of thought |
|---|---|---|
| Bernd Raffelhüschen | Uni Freiburg | ordoliberal / supply-side |
| Clemens Fuest | ifo | ordoliberal / supply-side |
| DIHK | DIHK | — |
| ERT | ERT | — |
| Hans Herbert von Arnim | — | — |
| Hans-Werner Sinn | ifo (em.) | ordoliberal / supply-side |
| IDW | IDW | — |
| Jürgen Matthes | IW Köln | ordoliberal / supply-side |
| Michael Hüther | IW Köln | ordoliberal / supply-side |
| Monopolkommission | Monopolkommission | — |
| Rainer Zitelmann | — | — |
13 candidates are under review and not listed until a person has decided.
How a voice gets here
A voice enters the roster as a candidate, usually because an aligned expert cited it or because its texts kept surfacing as leads. A person reviews its published positions against the school of thought the graph follows and marks it aligned or rejected. Nothing on this list was added by a script, and a candidate is never cited as support while its review is open.
Aligned does not mean the voice agrees with every claim. It means its texts are admissible evidence: when one of them is judged to support, dispute or qualify a claim, that judgement is recorded as a citation with the exact passage, and the claim's support state follows from the citations it holds. How the states are defined.